WebMattis v Pollock (t/a Flamingos Nightclub) [2003]. In this case a nightclub doorman, who had become involved in an argument with a customer, was chased away from the club by a group of four or five people. The group of people gathered at the corner of the street about 100 yards away from the club.

ate. The case of Mattis v Polloc

Web11 jul. 2024 · In Mattis -v- Pollock (t/a) Flamingos Nightclub (The Times Law Report 16 July 2003) the Court of Appeal held that a club doorman who stabbed a person in the … WebIt is already established law that if an employee, acting in the course of their employment, injures another, even if that employee’s actions go well beyond what they are trained or employed for for, their employers may well be held vicariously liable for their acts and will have to meet any consequential award of damages (see Mattis v Pollock t/a Flamingos … breathe joji

Mattis v Pollock (t/a Flamingos Nightclub) - Case Law - vLex

WebMattis v Pollock (t/a Flamingo's Nightclub) [2003] EWCA Civ 887, Court of Appeal on 1st July 2003, reported at [2003] ICR 1335 (also at [2003] IRLR 603). The full content of this … Web3 jul. 2008 · Sports employment – Rugby - Trespass to the person - Assault by rugby player during rugby match - Close connection between tort and employment WebHesley Hall Ltd. [2001] UKHL 22, [2002] 1 A.C. 215 (HL), [2001] 2 All ER 769, 2001 WL 415485 (evaluating circumstances where it would be appropriate to hold an employer vicariously liable for the intentional wrongdoing of an employee); Mattis v. *16 Pollock (t/a Flamingos Nightclub) [2003] EWCA Civ 887, [2004] P.I.Q.R. P3(CA (Civ. Div.)), 2003 ... cots carrier aircraft